Many international tech companies underestimate the complexity of China's Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL). This article outlines the five most common compliance mistakes and how to avoid them, potentially saving millions in fines and preventing market exclusion.
Mistake #1: Assuming Global Privacy Policies Apply to China
One of the most common mistakes is assuming that a privacy policy designed for European GDPR or US regulations will automatically comply with China's PIPL. This is a dangerous assumption.
Why it's a problem: PIPL has unique requirements that differ significantly from other data protection laws. For example, PIPL requires explicit consent for each specific purpose of data processing, not just a blanket consent. Additionally, PIPL mandates that privacy policies must be written in Chinese and be easily accessible to users.
How to avoid it: Work with legal experts who understand both PIPL and your business model. Create a China-specific privacy policy that addresses PIPL's unique requirements, including clear consent mechanisms, data subject rights, and cross-border transfer provisions.
Mistake #2: Ignoring Data Localization Requirements
Many companies assume they can store Chinese user data on servers located anywhere in the world. This is incorrect and can lead to severe penalties.
Why it's a problem: China's Data Security Law requires that "important data" and personal information of Chinese citizens must be stored within China. The definition of "important data" is broad and can include data related to national security, economic development, or public interest. For AI companies, training data containing Chinese user information often falls into this category.
How to avoid it: Conduct a data classification assessment to determine which data must be stored locally. Implement data localization infrastructure or partner with compliant cloud service providers in China. Ensure your data processing agreements clearly specify storage locations.
Mistake #3: Inadequate Consent Mechanisms
PIPL requires "separate consent" for specific high-risk activities, but many companies use generic consent forms that don't meet this standard.
Why it's a problem: PIPL mandates separate, explicit consent for activities such as sharing personal information with third parties, processing sensitive personal information, making personal information public, and cross-border transfers. A single "I agree" checkbox doesn't satisfy these requirements.
How to avoid it: Implement granular consent mechanisms that allow users to consent to each specific purpose separately. Use clear, plain language (in Chinese) to explain what users are consenting to. Provide easy mechanisms for users to withdraw consent.
Mistake #4: Underestimating Cross-Border Data Transfer Restrictions
Many international AI companies need to transfer data across borders for processing, training, or storage, but fail to comply with PIPL's strict cross-border transfer requirements.
Why it's a problem: PIPL requires one of three mechanisms for cross-border transfers: (1) passing a security assessment by the Cyberspace Administration of China, (2) obtaining personal information protection certification, or (3) entering into a standard contract with the overseas recipient. Many companies attempt transfers without any of these mechanisms.
How to avoid it: Work with legal experts to determine which transfer mechanism applies to your situation. Prepare the necessary documentation and approvals before initiating any cross-border data transfers. Consider using data localization to minimize transfer needs.
Mistake #5: Failing to Appoint a Local Representative
PIPL requires companies that process personal information of Chinese citizens but don't have a physical presence in China to appoint a local representative. Many companies are unaware of this requirement.
Why it's a problem: Without a local representative, companies cannot properly respond to data subject requests, regulatory inquiries, or enforcement actions. This can result in penalties and operational shutdowns.
How to avoid it: If your company processes personal information of Chinese citizens but doesn't have a China-based entity, appoint a qualified local representative. Ensure this representative has the authority and resources to handle PIPL compliance matters, including responding to data subject requests and regulatory inquiries.
Key Takeaways
- PIPL has unique requirements that differ from GDPR and other global privacy laws
- Data localization is mandatory for important data and personal information of Chinese citizens
- Consent mechanisms must be granular and specific to each purpose
- Cross-border data transfers require specific legal mechanisms
- Companies without China presence must appoint a local representative
Avoiding these mistakes requires expert knowledge of both PIPL requirements and your specific business model. Professional compliance review can identify risks before they become costly problems.
Need professional PIPL compliance review for your AI company? Let's discuss how we can help you avoid these costly mistakes.
Request Compliance Review